Hello everybody! I have the following issue: I have two countainers, let’s call them C1 and C2, and they both expose the same port, let’s say 1234. I want to route both of them through a gluetun container. to do this, I added
network_mode: container:gluetun
at each container. But they both expose the same port, so there’s a conflict. Without routing them though gluetun I can just
ports:
- 1235:1234
but using network_mode this cannot be done. What can I do? The only thing that comes to my mind is to use two gluetun containers, but I’d rather use a single one
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !selfhosted@lemmy.world
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.
Rules:
Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.
Resources:
selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
You can just change the port directly on the application for one of them.
Yeah that would be the best way to solve this problem.
thanks for the reply! many services allows this by setting an environmental variable or through a config file, but sadly not all of them
I’ve yet to come across one that doesn’t allow it, that’s a pretty important feature for anything listening on a port to have.