New cigarette regulations offer a point for public health to refer to that would advance solutions in alcohol consumption.
chaogomu
link
fedilink
71Y

While alcohol is a carcinogen, it only accounts for something like 3% of cancers deaths, mostly paired with liver disease. Hell, breathing air in a city causes more cancer deaths than alcohol.

This whole article reads like a modern temperance movement, trying to stamp out vice by comparing one harm to another, despite how different the harms are.

We know the harms of alcohol, they are different than the harms of tobacco. They should not be regulated the same. This article misses that completely.

FreeBooteR69
link
fedilink
51Y

Being a carcinogen is alcohols minor side effect. Don’t forget alcohol poisoning and the damage it does to families and relationships due to alcoholism, and another biggie, driving under the influence.

@EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
1Y

He clearly didn’t forget, unless you think tobacco also carries the same family and relationship damage and driving under the influence problems?

chaogomu
link
fedilink
31Y

Yes

We know the harms of alcohol, they are different than the harms of tobacco. They should not be regulated the same. This article misses that completely.

I just didn’t list out the harms of alcohol, or how they’re regulated, because I thought everyone knew.

Create a post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Regions

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social & Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


  • 1 user online
  • 140 users / day
  • 329 users / week
  • 680 users / month
  • 2.26K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 5.31K Posts
  • 47.8K Comments
  • Modlog