I’m not going to lose sleep over this. It’s posturing. Google’s threatening to “go on strike” to ratchet up the pressure.
These are all capitalist enterprises and they’ll find a resolution so they can keep making money. Or they won’t. The way that the law is written, small news aggregators that don’t enjoy a power advantage over the publishers could step into this space. Maybe this is a small business opportunity for local techies. :)
Google’s threatening to “go on strike” to ratchet up the pressure.
And it will work. It doesn’t hurt them much, but it’s devastating to the media companies because most of their traffic comes from Meta and Google.
If Jane Doe searches for “wildfires” and would have seen a story by the Toronto Star in her search results, she might have clicked it. If Google stops linking to the Star and instead now just links to a YouTube video of the wildfires, or a blog from someone nearby, Jane might click there instead. Since Google gets ad money from those sources too, it has zero effect on their bottom line, but destroys the traffic to the Star.
It’s why this “link tax” scheme failed in Germany, it failed in Australia, it’s failed everywhere that it’s been tried, since it’s a stupid idea.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
I’m not going to lose sleep over this. It’s posturing. Google’s threatening to “go on strike” to ratchet up the pressure.
These are all capitalist enterprises and they’ll find a resolution so they can keep making money. Or they won’t. The way that the law is written, small news aggregators that don’t enjoy a power advantage over the publishers could step into this space. Maybe this is a small business opportunity for local techies. :)
And it will work. It doesn’t hurt them much, but it’s devastating to the media companies because most of their traffic comes from Meta and Google.
If Jane Doe searches for “wildfires” and would have seen a story by the Toronto Star in her search results, she might have clicked it. If Google stops linking to the Star and instead now just links to a YouTube video of the wildfires, or a blog from someone nearby, Jane might click there instead. Since Google gets ad money from those sources too, it has zero effect on their bottom line, but destroys the traffic to the Star.
It’s why this “link tax” scheme failed in Germany, it failed in Australia, it’s failed everywhere that it’s been tried, since it’s a stupid idea.