Private trackers are well known for their elitist and insufferable users. I’d like to know the reasons behind their gatekeeping. Is it just mere elitism to feel superior or are there any other reasons? I’ve heard people saying they like to have a smaller number of high quality users for long term stability. I’ve even heard people tell they’re designed to keep government and federal agents away. I’d like to hear your thoughts.

neo (he/him)
link
fedilink
English
89M

yeah, real talk if feds want in they’re getting in

BolexForSoup
link
fedilink
69M

Louder for the folks who think incognito mode saves them from prying eyes lol

neo (he/him)
link
fedilink
English
69M

THE FEDS ARE PROBABLY ALREADY HERE

quirzle
link
fedilink
19M

Incognito mode has always been intended for prying eyes using the same browser, and it works fine for that.

Snot Flickerman
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
9M

Yes we know that, but Google wouldn’t have changed the warning about private windows if it wasn’t clear a lot of people think “incognito” means the equivalent of a VPN and TOR (partially because they don’t know what VPN/TOR are).

https://www.wired.com/story/chrome-incognito-mode-privacy-warning/

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

  • 1 user online
  • 97 users / day
  • 262 users / week
  • 956 users / month
  • 3.43K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.41K Posts
  • 82.3K Comments
  • Modlog