“I was well within my rights and I was not doing anything unjust,” Dsta’hyl told reporters on Wednesday. “We were seizing equipment that was destroying our lands.”
He may well have been within his rights. But it also seems clear that he was not imprisoned “solely because of his political, religious, or other conscientiously held beliefs.” I don’t understand the rationale for this declaration.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
He may well have been within his rights. But it also seems clear that he was not imprisoned “solely because of his political, religious, or other conscientiously held beliefs.” I don’t understand the rationale for this declaration.
Imprisoned != house arrest
That’s an extremely concerning take
Lol