Albertan cities have been very good about planning for future supply. Former Calgary mayor Nenshi explicitly zoned for future housing, which cities like Toronto and Vancouver refuse to do.

Don’t Albertan cities simply have more space to sprawl onto? Vancouver is bounded by the river, by mountains, by the other river, by the US border, by the ocean…

It’s a bit of a struggle for Vancouver to sprawl.

Vancouver geography is not that constrained. Land use is just very bad. The classic Vancouver skyline is a surprisingly small area. It’s surrounded by SFH suburbs. The Lower Mainland has tons of strip malls and parking lots due to car culture. It’s not a lack of land, it’s a bad use of land.

  • BC Lower mainland: 36,000 km^2. Population 3 million.
  • Netherlands: 41,500 km^2. Population 17 million.
  • Belgium: 30,500 km^2. Population 11.7 million.
  • Switzerland: 41,250 km^2. Population 8.7 million.

These countries are not Hong Kong. They have nature, a mix of big cities and small towns, and lots of low density areas. Switzerland is a famously mountainous region with lots of untouched nature and rural areas.

Compared to Calgary?

Yup, same with Edmonton. Housing prices here have been essentially flat for 15 years despite a steadily growing population, and that’s not an accident but a direct consequence of smart planning.

Create a post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


  • 1 user online
  • 164 users / day
  • 286 users / week
  • 574 users / month
  • 1.99K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 5.74K Posts
  • 51.2K Comments
  • Modlog