The cost of another rate hike will be paid by workers in the form of higher unemployment and lower real wages, Gustavo Indart writes.

Yeah, and rental prices have skyrocketed too.

During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

At this point I can ignore our insane grocery/telecom prices, even though that is still a huge issue. The housing crises has far worse ripple effects down the chain: potential buyers can’t buy so they rent nicer places, potential renters can’t rent the nice places so they are overpaying for the rentals they can afford, and people who can’t afford any of the rental prices are scraping by with roommates or on the streets.

And these development companies have the nerve to go to court over government investigations over their shady practices.

Shameless.

@EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
1Y

During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

Why not just vote properly – for someone who will work for you with honour and respect? Then you can actually sit down with the employee you hired and guide them in the right direction. Hiring some hothead employee who thinks they’ve got it all figured out, and lets you believe they’ve got it all figured out, is a recipe for disaster.

Why not just vote properly – for someone who will work for you with honour and respect?

A government that seeks to keep a roof over your head over a few extra dollars in their personal bank accounts IS a government that is treating us with honour and respect. The big two don’t have any respect for the common Canadian, aside from milquetoast progressive talking points occasionally, or populist bullshit.

If making housing affordable for everyone is a single issue vote then so be it. I can respect that more than a multitude of other idiotic reasons to be a single issue voter.

A government that seeks to keep a roof over your head over a few extra dollars in their personal bank accounts IS a government that is treating us with honour and respect.

That may be true, but importantly the hired employee needs to be working for you, not themselves or some other interest. If they already have it figured out how they want to address these problem before they’ve even talked to you, it is unlikely that they are actually there to do the job they are meant to do.

Of course, it could also be that you are just as lazy and will refuse to speak with your employee after you’ve hired him. In which case your poor leadership is the true recipe for disaster.

During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

What do you expect is going to happen? Every party is going to make promises to fix the crisis and none of them will deliver. You really think election promises mean anything?

I’d believe the NDP to be sincere in their promise to fix it, at least until they prove otherwise, but they won’t be elected so they won’t get the chance

Yeah it’s easy to believe in someone who will never get a chance to show if they deserved your belief or not.

@tarsn@lemmy.ca
creator
link
fedilink
31Y

I mean the alternative is voting for someone who time and again has proven they’re not acting with your interests in mind, and I’m talking both red and blue here

Yeah … I know. I vote NDP too but I’m not under any delusions. Singh is very much ingrained in the upper class. You think he’s gotten this far without making any promises to the wealthy? I don’t have much hope, but at least there’s no track record of them fucking Canadians, like there is with the Libs and Cons.

Certainly. Hiring among union members will never be in your best interest as their employer. Unions work for the employees – forever and always.

The employers (i.e. you and me) in some ridings have little choice, though. The talent pool is only so large.

FlareHeart
link
fedilink
31Y

During the next federal election this will be my “single issue” that will determine who I vote for.

This should read PROVINCIAL election. Housing policies are the jurisdiction of the provinces. If you think the Premiers are going to tolerate the Feds mucking around in something they perceive as THEIR jurisdiction, there will be a big fight over it. Take this to your Premier, it’s their wheel-house.

Fair point, Dougie needs to fucking go.

And for the record OF COURSE I care about other issues. Maybe my original comment was too extreme. There is no way I am going to vote for any rage-baiting, fear mongering, regressive asshole. If someone presented an amazing, ground-breaking housing plan but was also a neo-nazi I wouldn’t vote for them LMAO.

I am just so tired of all the political theatre around housing. It just seems like a no-brainer that should cross party lines. The only people who don’t care are the people who are rich, or who are in the pockets of rich development/property management companies. Even the older generations who own a single home care, they probably have children who they know won’t ever be able to afford a home or pay a fair price to rent something.

Create a post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Regions

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social & Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


  • 1 user online
  • 140 users / day
  • 329 users / week
  • 680 users / month
  • 2.26K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 5.31K Posts
  • 47.8K Comments
  • Modlog