In his seventh day in the chair, the new Speaker of the House of Commons sought to address MPs on the topic of decorum in the chamber. Much disorder followed.
Greg Fergus, who was elected Speaker earlier this month, advised MPs on October 4 that he would be coming forward with “reflective guidelines” to foster civility in the House. He chose Wednesday afternoon, immediately before question period, to do so.
But before Fergus could begin his remarks, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was on his feet, apparently expecting to ask the first question of question period.
After a few awkward seconds, Poilievre attempted to ask his question, prompting Fergus to stop him and state that the Conservative leader would be able to ask his question once the Speaker was done speaking. But Poilievre stayed on his feet, prompting Fergus to seek advice from one of the House of Commons procedural clerks.
Greg Fergus, who was elected Speaker earlier this month, advised MPs on October 4 that he would be coming forward with “reflective guidelines” to foster civility in the House.
Less than three minutes into his statement, Conservative deputy whip Chris Warkentin stood on a point of order to suggest Fergus was filibustering the House and ask when the Speaker expected to be done.
“I decided to stand for Speaker because in the eight years that I have been a member, and prior to that as a keen follower of parliamentary proceedings, I have noticed a deterioration in the collective decorum in this place,” Fergus said, shortly before Warkentin’s interruption.
Despite much evidence to the contrary, it suggests that politics is not fated to be practised at the level of the schoolyard — that adults are capable of behaving in a way that doesn’t embarrass themselves or the the central institution of Canadian democracy.
Fergus said he would use the tools at his disposal to pursue these issues, but also vowed to work with MPs and parties privately to “see how we can join forces in our collective objective to improve the decorum in our proceedings.”
Depending on how hard Fergus pushes, he may face claims that he’s unnecessarily restricting MPs’ freedom of speech or ability to hold the government to account.
The original article contains 1,057 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Sorry Ryan, the harshness in that comment was not really aimed at you there, just a general statement about the things he says, especially in this context. I understand the curiosity, but I’d rather not give him another platform to spew his manipulation from.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
Every single Speaker makes this speech - including Andrew Scheer himself.
No reason to expect this one to suddenly have an impact.
Except they’re grown adults so I expect them to act like it.
Mr polievre went from college to parliament, so he may not have had to mix with people enough.
I’d have to check the records to be sure, but I think past members of Parliament have also been grown adults.
And?
You just presented it as a reason things will be different this time…
I stated how I expect grown adults to act like in Parliament.
My fault for expecting your reply to be related to what I had said, I guess.
It’s fun to be embarrassed about the next government already…
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Greg Fergus, who was elected Speaker earlier this month, advised MPs on October 4 that he would be coming forward with “reflective guidelines” to foster civility in the House.
Less than three minutes into his statement, Conservative deputy whip Chris Warkentin stood on a point of order to suggest Fergus was filibustering the House and ask when the Speaker expected to be done.
“I decided to stand for Speaker because in the eight years that I have been a member, and prior to that as a keen follower of parliamentary proceedings, I have noticed a deterioration in the collective decorum in this place,” Fergus said, shortly before Warkentin’s interruption.
Despite much evidence to the contrary, it suggests that politics is not fated to be practised at the level of the schoolyard — that adults are capable of behaving in a way that doesn’t embarrass themselves or the the central institution of Canadian democracy.
Fergus said he would use the tools at his disposal to pursue these issues, but also vowed to work with MPs and parties privately to “see how we can join forces in our collective objective to improve the decorum in our proceedings.”
Depending on how hard Fergus pushes, he may face claims that he’s unnecessarily restricting MPs’ freedom of speech or ability to hold the government to account.
The original article contains 1,057 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Good on him. I feel embarrassed when I see clips of what goes on in Parliament
Same. It’s like watching a bunch of bratty, entitled kids whose parents never taught them manners.
What was PP’s question?
Who gives a shit, it was either in poor taste or bad faith, either way not worth the time spent thinking about it
LOL OK, was just curious. How dare you tell me what to not think about! My brain, my choice.
Sorry Ryan, the harshness in that comment was not really aimed at you there, just a general statement about the things he says, especially in this context. I understand the curiosity, but I’d rather not give him another platform to spew his manipulation from.
Yeah, I was expecting it to be something idiotic but on the off-chance that it wasn’t, I was being curious.
“A broken watch” and all, right?
Probably “when is lunch?”