That’s a shame. Echo chambers just enable validation.

Name 1 society that hasn’t destroyed another and taken their land.

What laws did they break to make it illegal?

Also before you ride away on your high horse. You might want to read this.

https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/the-1st-americans-were-not-who-we-thought-they-were

Looks like there was a whole different group of people here before the natives arrived and slaughtered everyone and stole their land. Welcome to human history.

90% of the people in my department are Indians. They have social groups where they tell each other how to break the law. It’s not about surviving it’s about pretending you’re a big shot back home by being international and worldly.

I’ve had people offer me $50k to marry one of their relatives or to lend me money to buy a house in my name and then transfer the deed. Yes I reported them both. They clearly don’t need help to survive.

Or how about those guys exploiting Brampton food banks with thousands of dollars in their accounts and posting on Instagram in Hindi about how to get “free food” in Canada?

Illegal immigrants. Pretty obvious. They aren’t here to make Canada home. They are here to take what they can before leaving Canadians holding the bag. Ever wonder why they stop at PR and never apply for citizenship?

Nope. Colonists is a completely different word. Imagine that. Different things are different things.

What’s stopping people from reporting those companies as well? By the way when it comes to economic immigrants they aren’t looking for a better life. They are looking to pretend to have a better life while talking about how much better they had it back home. If you worked with them you would know it’s all for showing off.

Economic immigrants are not refugees.

Instead of being mad at land lords trying to make money, be mad at the rich immigrants who don’t give a shit about exploiting and destabilizing our home.

Anyone who has taken a statistics course at the university level can see these numbers are dog shit. For a hypothesis to be statistically significant it needs to be at the very least 5% to reject the null.

This study was published for idiots who think education is listening to the media.

Immigants!