Thanks for the explanation! I saw several more downvotes at the time I made my comment, I think it was 4 downvotes for the parent comment and 2 for the second comment. Votes between instances aren’t always consistent, I’ve noticed when I switch accounts that the same comment’s votes can vary quite a lot.

Did you read their post? They explained that they are posting lead comments with the names of different VPNs, and they want us to vote and comment on the ones we use with our reasoning.

For a noob, can anyone explain why this one is getting downvoted? Is it bad?

Both of the victims told the air crew what happened. They were moved to new seats and that was that. The airline then refused to share details of the incidents or their protocol for handling such issues with anyone, and they signed the paper for the unaccompanied minor claiming her daughter had been delivered safely. Sure, she was delivered, but she was assaulted.

The 19 year old was asked what she wanted to do, but she had just been assaulted and the onus to act should not have been on her. She clearly wasn’t feeling listened to or supported, so she just dropped it in defeat.

I’ve done the exact same thing in the face of a cop asking me “yea but did he ever make you feel in danger?” regarding the man who was stalking me and taking pictures of me through my window. Of course I felt in danger, but the cops face was so annoyed and dismissive, with a “what do you expect me to do about it” tone.

The airline has made conflicting statements. At one point they claimed they were never told of the incidents, at another they claim they followed the appropriate protocol and detail exactly how they responded to being told. I’m not inclined to believe them when they can’t keep their story straight.

If I directly downloaded it, and am using lemmy on a different device, is there still a way for them to link my comment to my online behavior?

This is the first movie I ever pirated, specifically because of this bullshit pricing. Now I have a VPN and a 500 GB server, which I’m sure will need to be upgraded at some point lol

What a fucking dipshit sexual assaulter this surgeon is.

FTFY

Edit:

She agreed to perform the exam and began to explain the procedure to Innantuono, the document states. Before she could leave the room to give Innantuono time to undress, the surgeon removed his bottoms, exposing himself to the woman, it reads.

“This startled Ms. X,” the document reads. She then asked the surgeon to cover himself, which he did not do, the ruling states. Instead, it says Ms. X moved to cover the man’s genitals herself using a towel, which he soon removed.

According to the decision, Innantuono then requested Ms. X perform an exam that was not indicated on his requisition form – an inguinal hernia exam – which is done in the groin area, near the pubic bones.

The surgeon then asked the woman to palpate him for hernias, “although that is not the role of an ultrasound technician,” the ruling reads.

However, “because of Dr. Iannantuono’s position as a senior surgeon in the hospital, she felt compelled to be cooperative and deferential,” it continues.

As Ms. X examined one side of his groin, Iannantuono once again removed a towel placed over his genitals, grabbed Ms. X’s hand to reposition it and in doing so, caused her to touch his penis. The ruling states he did the same on the other side, and then for a third time, after making her repeat the first side.

Before leaving, Iannantuono stood from the table, allowing the towels to drop to the floor and once again exposing himself to the woman, the tribunal found.