Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me

Tl;dr - some businesses will be impacted, but it probably won’t drag down our economy much at all.

Wasn’t there a similar story about “Born in the USA” ?

He probably has lawyers fighting literally every step

It’s self reported. They released it before he entered the building

Granted, but I don’t think they can really discern the difference

Their position on Russia is one of the more ridiculous contortions for Trump fanatics. They claim to hate communism and love freedom and yet their daddy sold out to the Kremlin so they have to find ways to act like they wanted us to be Russian apologists all along.

This. Have we really not learned this lesson? We need to take what he says literally and seriously.

If only horrible economic policy was the worst thing to worry about

I’d like to believe that that’s true, but I’ve been disappointed by our political system too many times to believe it .

Lifetime appointees with no accountability reject call for accountability. Shocking

Cool so he knows one gay person who at least acts ok with being called this slur, and now he has the green light to call anyone the same name. Didn’t know that’s how it works.

Yep. It’s stupid shit like this that got him indicted in the first place.

I bet they still love him. In typical dictator fashion, anyone who doesn’t worship him surely has been purged long ago.

The tldr here is this:

These constitutional scholars dug into the original meaning of the 14th amendment and concluded that Trump easily meets the bar for having “engaged in” the Jan 6th insurrection, thereby disqualifying him from holding office.

I believe it all comes down to the term “engaged in”. Some say he didn’t because he was not literally storming the capital with the rioters. These two law professors are arguing (in a peer reviewed law journal) that the original intent of that term includes all the stuff Trump did.