The non-binding decision made by a Canadian military tribunal could result in a flood of new lawsuits against the federal government and reopen a divisive debate over vaccine mandates, a legal expert says.
The non-binding decision made by a Canadian military tribunal could result in a flood of new lawsuits against the federal government and reopen a divisive debate over vaccine mandates, a legal expert says.
yeah, any commander(whatever higher up role has the authority to issue such order) that thinks it’s okay and then leads to mass infection like US Navy would lost their job and if in active war probably military court trials. Imaging losing combat capability during your mission cause you want to accommodate people that don’t want to get vaccinated.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
That challenge won’t hold up. There is ample precedent for mandatory vaccination (excepting medical exemptions)
yeah, any commander(whatever higher up role has the authority to issue such order) that thinks it’s okay and then leads to mass infection like US Navy would lost their job and if in active war probably military court trials. Imaging losing combat capability during your mission cause you want to accommodate people that don’t want to get vaccinated.
Yeah, I think you’re probably right. I don’t think this is anything new and there were exemptions allowed.
Both in Canada and the US.
You sign you get stabbed.