The non-binding decision made by a Canadian military tribunal could result in a flood of new lawsuits against the federal government and reopen a divisive debate over vaccine mandates, a legal expert says.
The non-binding decision made by a Canadian military tribunal could result in a flood of new lawsuits against the federal government and reopen a divisive debate over vaccine mandates, a legal expert says.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
When did “Trump made my sniveling fear of icky needles into a brave political stance” become reasonable OR an excuse?
Never was.
No, it’s a defense for the CAF as to why they accommodated those who were unable to take the vaccine but not those who were unwilling.