In a well-intentioned yet dangerous move to fight online fraud, France is on the verge of forcing browsers to create a dystopian technical capability. Article 6 (para II and III) of the SREN Bill would force browser providers to create the means to mandatorily block websites present on a government provided list.

I don’t agree that it’s “well-intentioned” at all but the article goes on to point out the potential for abuse by copyright holders.

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/64123

[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]

Unruffled [he/him]
creator
mod
link
fedilink
English
91Y

There is absolutely no need to bring left vs right identity politics into the discussion, please stick to the topic of piracy. Same goes for the replies below. Thanks.

@acastcandream@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
-5
edit-2
5M
spoiler

asdfasdfsadfasfasdf

Kilgore Trout
link
fedilink
English
41Y

Why should we give up on trying to listen to each other’s point of view?

It’s never too late to learn how to participate in a community.

@acastcandream@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
5M
spoiler

asdfasdfsadfasfasdf

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

  • 1 user online
  • 133 users / day
  • 382 users / week
  • 866 users / month
  • 3.42K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.48K Posts
  • 83.3K Comments
  • Modlog