they’re not a commodity

Oh, but they are.

(I totally agree they shouldn’t be.)

regalia
link
fedilink
42Y

sad by true 😭

@EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
2Y

No, they are not. The defining feature of a commodity is that it is interchangeable.

If you in Ontario try to charge me too much for a bushel of wheat, I’ll laugh and buy it from a guy in Saskatchewan selling it at a reasonable price instead. Makes no difference to me. The product is the same either way.

If I try to charge you too much for a house in Ontario, it would make no difference to you to move to Saskatchewan? I suspect not. They are not equivalent products. Living in the Ontario home will be a very different experience to living in the Saskatchewan home.

If housing were a commodity, a lot of our problems would be solved. But, housing is not. It even has a popular slogan to remind you of that fact: Location, location, location.

A commodity is defined by fungibility, and RE is fungible for the firms doing most of the buying and selling affecting prices - even if it isn’t so much for you or I.

Create a post

What’s going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


  • 1 user online
  • 574 users / day
  • 1.36K users / week
  • 1.96K users / month
  • 3.07K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.29K Posts
  • 70.8K Comments
  • Modlog