They’re wanting it to be a different film about something else. The flim isn’t called “Manhatten Project” or “We Built a Nuke”, it’s called “Oppenheimer” and it’s about him and his experience. If he had no part in the acquisition of the material, then it has no place in the film as it wasn’t crucial to his characters story. Same as we don’t see what happens in Japan as his character turn is driven by his disappointment in being cut out the loop as soon as he delivers the bombs and feeling guilty about all the death he indirectly caused.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
They’re wanting it to be a different film about something else. The flim isn’t called “Manhatten Project” or “We Built a Nuke”, it’s called “Oppenheimer” and it’s about him and his experience. If he had no part in the acquisition of the material, then it has no place in the film as it wasn’t crucial to his characters story. Same as we don’t see what happens in Japan as his character turn is driven by his disappointment in being cut out the loop as soon as he delivers the bombs and feeling guilty about all the death he indirectly caused.
removed by mod
removed by mod
removed by mod
removed by mod