Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
But why would
3?"stuff":"empty"
work andfoo?"stuff":"empty"
not work?Syntactically significant whitespace is a nightmare to deal with.
I agree! I don’t think
3?”stuff”:”empty”
should work at all because I think it’s an insane way to type a ternary :) I’m also very open to admitting that it’s just my own strongly worded opinion.I think that in most cases, syntactically significant whitespace is a horrible idea - the one exception being that you should have space between operators/identifiers/etc. I don’t care how much, and 4 spaces should have no more special meaning than 1, but I do think that using a space to indicate “this thing is a different thing than the thing before it” is important.
Talking with a rubyist:
3?"bar":"qux"
only has the ternary expression as a valid parsing of?
foo?"bar":"qux"
fails becausefoo
may be a method andfoo?
is also a valid method identifier.foo ?"bar":"qux"
fails because?"
uses the?
unary operator that makes the next character a string. So?"bar"
becomes the string"
followed by what looks to be an identifier.And so…
?
character is a valid part of an identifier (but only at the end of a method name)?x
unary operator to create a String from a characterexpr?expr:expr
ternary operatorAnd so…