This wouldn’t have prevented CA from moving forward with their insulin, and would have helped diabetics in the meantime (or in case that plan falls through in the end).
He’s been vetoing anything remotely controversial, mostly on the progressive side as he tries to push more centrist for a presidential run, and it sucks.
It’s controversial because its a bad bill that’s easy to pick apart. Capping the copay is stupid. It does nothing for those without insurance. And for those with insurance, the insurers will just jack up other rates instead.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
This wouldn’t have prevented CA from moving forward with their insulin, and would have helped diabetics in the meantime (or in case that plan falls through in the end).
He’s been vetoing anything remotely controversial, mostly on the progressive side as he tries to push more centrist for a presidential run, and it sucks.
It’s controversial because its a bad bill that’s easy to pick apart. Capping the copay is stupid. It does nothing for those without insurance. And for those with insurance, the insurers will just jack up other rates instead.