trash
fedilink
@oranki@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
English
41Y

Wireguard runs over UDP, the port is undistinguishable from closed ports for most common port scanning bots. Changing the port will obfuscate the traffic a bit. Even if someone manages to guess the port, they’ll still need to use the right key, otherwise the response is like from a wrong port - no response. Your ISP can still see that it’s Wireguard traffic if they happen to be looking, but can’t decipher the contents.

I would drop containers from the equation and just run Wireguard on the host. When issues arise, you’ll have a hard time identifying the problem when container networking is in the mix.

@hayalci@fstab.sh
link
fedilink
English
51Y

+1 on not using containers.for Network routing stuff That way lies pain and misery.

@Dust0741@lemmy.world
creator
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Fair enough. I’ve had success with it though. I should probably just use the official wireguard not wg-easy

Create a post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

  • 1 user online
  • 191 users / day
  • 419 users / week
  • 1.14K users / month
  • 3.85K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.71K Posts
  • 74.6K Comments
  • Modlog