I understand the sentiment, but Netflix having a monopoly on streaming content wasn’t a good situation, either.

Jolteon
link
fedilink
English
651Y

The ideal solution is multiple competing services with the same content.

@can@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
261Y

Like music streaming services figured out years ago.

@bradbeattie@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
71Y

I’d recommend considering how the recently expired https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc. would have applied to streaming services.

Yeah, the moment Netflix announced House of Cards, the US government should’ve hit them with this. Could’ve prevented this streaming mess.

@Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
link
fedilink
English
51Y

The usurper delivered us from the evil that was cable or nothing.

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the enemy. The cycle must repeat

There is a difference between 1, 4 and 30 streaming services…

Does Walmart have a monopoly on kinder chocolate? The idea is to have several distributors each with as complete a catalog as possible. Having such a shattered offers between platforms makes it very noncompetitive against any piracy solution.

This right here dammit.

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

  • 1 user online
  • 235 users / day
  • 425 users / week
  • 926 users / month
  • 3.44K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.46K Posts
  • 83.1K Comments
  • Modlog