no, its like if I erase a part of a picture, I can bring it back at any point without undoing
so let’s say I erase someone’s eye, and in a new layer I paint something there. I edit that thing for an hour. now I decide I want that eye back, I can simply unerase it
because usually, edits are “baked in”. you crop, the program discards the pixels that you cut off. Photoshop remembers those pixels, just doesn’t render them
I still can’t understand. In your example most likely I selected the eye then clicked suppr, I can go back and copy it after selection? Or you’re talking about an ability to re-arrange actions ?
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
non destructive editing like people are pointing out, for me a big thing is content aware stuff (fill, crop), and also just being used to PS
huh? do you mean undo history? It is on Gimp, and I think it even made into Windows Paint at this point
no, its like if I erase a part of a picture, I can bring it back at any point without undoing
so let’s say I erase someone’s eye, and in a new layer I paint something there. I edit that thing for an hour. now I decide I want that eye back, I can simply unerase it
does this project (there is a demonstration video in the link) address the thing ?
because usually, edits are “baked in”. you crop, the program discards the pixels that you cut off. Photoshop remembers those pixels, just doesn’t render them
yes
I still can’t understand. In your example most likely I selected the eye then clicked suppr, I can go back and copy it after selection? Or you’re talking about an ability to re-arrange actions ?
Also, shit UX/UI. The MuseScore designer should take over GIMP and save it.