Streaming Pirates Are Hollywood’s New Villains
www.bloomberg.com
external-link
Illegal subscription services that steal films or TV shows bring in $2 billion a year in ads and subscriber fees.
Funderpants
link
fedilink
English
610M

I don’t disagree, but isn’t there something to be said for denying people access to the popular culture based on their ability to pay for it?

pbjamm
link
fedilink
English
110M

Most places will still have OTA broadcasts of content, at least from the major networks. That is still “free” but cable/digital TV prices are ridiculous.

Where I live there are no digital broadcast stations available so expensive subscription TV or piracy are the best options.

Not particularly. Things generally cost money. It’s not a human rights violation to say you can’t see a movie if you have zero dollars.

Funderpants
link
fedilink
English
610M

So then we don’t worry about people’s ability to engage in their communities through shared experiences and exposure to arts and culture, we just leave people out? Exclude them if they’re poor. I don’t think I care for that to be honest.

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

  • 1 user online
  • 249 users / day
  • 436 users / week
  • 935 users / month
  • 3.44K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.47K Posts
  • 83.2K Comments
  • Modlog