OOP is one of, if not the most popular programming paradigm. Surely understanding it at a theoretical level isn’t useless. It would be the first step to understanding its benefits and trade offs.
You are right. But I still find the ‘heavier’ theory, that is what I assumed OP refered to, to be more difficult to grasp then following a basic tutorial and just trying to solve problems.
In time with practice you get a better understanding for WHY the theory is how it is, and you can apply it better and of course improve your code. And that understanding will unlock more tools both in OOP and in your mind.
So if you are struggling, I recommend not starting with theory.
I see where you’re coming from, I think. In my experiences with trying to follow tutorials though, I’ve found the difficulty to be between rough explanations and the examples given feeling a little too simple and isolated from how they might be applied in a working program.
Anyway, OP read different sources about OOP and still needs to ask the definition… At some point it is better to just do something than to keep banging your head at the theory. If learning to code is your endgoal
Theoretical level is useless, believe me. What is useful is understanding at intuitive level. You can achieve it with or without knowing theory, but you need a lot of practice anyway. Also, different languages providing OOP actually encourage different approaches. You have to follow one that your PL is suited to and that is the best solution for your current task, not that OOP or any other paradigm dictates you.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programming@programming.dev
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos
OOP is one of, if not the most popular programming paradigm. Surely understanding it at a theoretical level isn’t useless. It would be the first step to understanding its benefits and trade offs.
Use it for a while, to complement your theoretical study. Things will only become clearer when you have your own understanding and opinion about it.
How would one use it if they’re struggling to understand it to start with? 🤨
You are right. But I still find the ‘heavier’ theory, that is what I assumed OP refered to, to be more difficult to grasp then following a basic tutorial and just trying to solve problems. In time with practice you get a better understanding for WHY the theory is how it is, and you can apply it better and of course improve your code. And that understanding will unlock more tools both in OOP and in your mind.
So if you are struggling, I recommend not starting with theory.
I see where you’re coming from, I think. In my experiences with trying to follow tutorials though, I’ve found the difficulty to be between rough explanations and the examples given feeling a little too simple and isolated from how they might be applied in a working program.
Yes, and often incomplete or not maintained.
Anyway, OP read different sources about OOP and still needs to ask the definition… At some point it is better to just do something than to keep banging your head at the theory. If learning to code is your endgoal
Theoretical level is useless, believe me. What is useful is understanding at intuitive level. You can achieve it with or without knowing theory, but you need a lot of practice anyway. Also, different languages providing OOP actually encourage different approaches. You have to follow one that your PL is suited to and that is the best solution for your current task, not that OOP or any other paradigm dictates you.