^ assume he means after this year but he didn’t say that and it doesn’t mean anything
And yeah he’s not going to suspend players for being under investigation, especially not in this case where the union will have to look evil by defending them. But why not just say that?
Apparently some people are not assuming their innocence which further illustrates why you don’t want to get into a fight with the union
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
It was a really weird conversation anyway
^ assume he means after this year but he didn’t say that and it doesn’t mean anything
And yeah he’s not going to suspend players for being under investigation, especially not in this case where the union will have to look evil by defending them. But why not just say that?
Apparently some people are not assuming their innocence which further illustrates why you don’t want to get into a fight with the union
Suspensions while under investigation make sense when a person is in a role where their job is to interact with potential victims.
Having a policy that suspends employees while they are under investigation increases opposition to investigations.
Like there wasn’t opposition to this investigation from the start? 🤔