Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault says the federal government will stop investing in new road infrastructure — a comment that immediately drew the ire of the Opposition Conservatives and some premiers who said the climate activist turned politician is out of touch.
Guilbeault said Tuesday the government will be there to support provinces paying for maintenance but Ottawa has decided that the existing road infrastructure “is perfectly adequate to respond to the needs we have.”
“There will be no more envelopes from the federal government to enlarge the road network,” Guilbeault said, according to quotes published in the Montreal Gazette.
“We can very well achieve our goals of economic, social and human development without more enlargement of the road network.”
Guilbeault said the federal government is intent on moving people out of their cars and into public transportation, which the government has spent billions to build.
The federal government also wants to encourage “active transportation,” which means getting people to walk and cycle.
I think it’s more a clarification than a walk back. They aren’t going to grow the road system, but road maintenance and safety upgrades were never on the chopping block.
That’s exactly what I took from reading the original article. You’d have to want to see something else in order to see it some other way, or be an incompetent reader.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
I think it’s more a clarification than a walk back. They aren’t going to grow the road system, but road maintenance and safety upgrades were never on the chopping block.
Basically no more “one more lane bro”
just like they said “heating oil will cost more bro trust me bro just get a heat pump bro ditch the oil bro”.
Both of these initiatives are great, but they require discipline, which the Liberals sorely lack.
That’s exactly what I took from reading the original article. You’d have to want to see something else in order to see it some other way, or be an incompetent reader.