The GTA has been showing signs of the urban ills that are commonly associated with city life south the border
The GTA has been showing signs of the urban ills that are commonly associated with city life south the border.
Downtown infrastructure has been deteriorating, as have cleanliness and order, which were once the city’s strong suits.
In Ontario, growth has shifted to lower-cost places like Kitchener-Waterloo (110 kilometres from downtown Toronto), as well as Guelph (95 km), Peterborough (140 km) and London (195 km). Even long declining areas, like the Maritimes, have been gaining population in recent years.
Clearly a new approach is merited. Leaders in Toronto have to accept dispersion and find the city’s niche within a wider range of settlements. Downtowns themselves, as Calgary’s urban leadership now suggests, will have to morph from primarily business centres to places more oriented to housing, academic and cultural activities.
To be sure, swank high-rise projects may appeal to the wealthy and the childless. But the urban future lies in places that are walkable but not hyper-dense and can attract middle-income families.
That’s what I said. We should increase the existing density of other cities besides Toronto. Toronto has great public transit and walkability in the downtown core. If other cities had large downtown employers and denser cores, they too would have enough commuters to justify good transit as well.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
deleted by creator
That’s what I said. We should increase the existing density of other cities besides Toronto. Toronto has great public transit and walkability in the downtown core. If other cities had large downtown employers and denser cores, they too would have enough commuters to justify good transit as well.