we love google (and LLMs)

further fact check showed that THE IMAGE HAS BEEN EDITED

@Seudo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
-4
edit-2
6M

Should Reddit or quora be liable if Google used a link instead? Ai doesn’t need to work 100% of the time. It just needs to be better than what we are using.

What you’re focused on is actually the DMCA safe harbor provision.

If Reddit says, “We have a platform and some dumbass said to snort granulated sugar” it’s different from Google saying, “You should snort granulated sugar.”

@Seudo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
6M

That’s… not relevant to my point at all.

Make it apple employees in store and Microsoft forums. If humans give bad advice 10% of the time and Ai (or any technological replacement) makes mistakes 1% of the time, you can’t point to that 1% as a gotcha.

You’re shifting the goal posts though - prior to AI being an expert reference on the internet was expensive and dangerous, since you could potentially be held liable - as such a lot of topic areas simply lacked expert reference sources. Google has declared itself an expert reference in every topic utilizing Gemini - it isn’t, this will end badly for them.

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 156 users / day
  • 315 users / week
  • 702 users / month
  • 2.84K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.57K Posts
  • 34.8K Comments
  • Modlog