As the other person sarcastically implied, these sites are intentionally split to make it more difficult to take them all down at once. When one goes down another can pop up, and in the mean time the others are there, on and on forever.
So are you saying we shouldn’t group them together?
Do you know enough about copyright law to know whether or not an online list grouping them together will make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down?
I feel like this is attempt of an “akswually” moment.
No. We don’t know about copyright law (and I’m sure you don’t either) but based on previous precedent, it’s not wise to put a everything in one since if something “happens” there will be no alternatives since…the sole source will be gone due to everything being grouped into the sole source.
it’s not wise to put a everything in one since if something “happens” there will be no alternatives since…the sole source will be gone due to everything being grouped into the sole source.
Umm, what? It’s just a list grouping them together.
How are they going to identify the ‘sole source’ out of that?
I don’t think you know enough about copyright law to know whether or not an online list grouping them together will make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down.
You clearly know zero abt copyright law if you think law enforcement is legitimately getting involved. 9.99999999 times out 10 it’s a letter from a lawyer.
So how does an online list grouping them together make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down? For reference, there is already a list of free streaming sites; it’s the list in question. I’m merely mentioning adding further classification for duplicate streaming sites.
It’s sad watching the upvote ratios, but I can’t say I’m surprised. The internet is full of 🧩’s.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
As the other person sarcastically implied, these sites are intentionally split to make it more difficult to take them all down at once. When one goes down another can pop up, and in the mean time the others are there, on and on forever.
So are you saying we shouldn’t group them together?
Do you know enough about copyright law to know whether or not an online list grouping them together will make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down?
I feel like this is attempt of an “akswually” moment.
No. We don’t know about copyright law (and I’m sure you don’t either) but based on previous precedent, it’s not wise to put a everything in one since if something “happens” there will be no alternatives since…the sole source will be gone due to everything being grouped into the sole source.
Umm, what? It’s just a list grouping them together.
How are they going to identify the ‘sole source’ out of that?
I don’t think you know enough about copyright law to know whether or not an online list grouping them together will make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down.
You clearly know zero abt copyright law if you think law enforcement is legitimately getting involved. 9.99999999 times out 10 it’s a letter from a lawyer.
I know right? Imagine doubling down on such an L take. And not even a good one
So how does an online list grouping them together make it significantly easier for law enforcement to take them down? For reference, there is already a list of free streaming sites; it’s the list in question. I’m merely mentioning adding further classification for duplicate streaming sites.
It’s sad watching the upvote ratios, but I can’t say I’m surprised. The internet is full of 🧩’s.
Way to go, turning a legitimate question with legitimate answers into an opportunity to insult an unrelated group of people 👍🏽
It’s not a question of law. It’s a question of logistics.
Grouping them together in a list will not affect those logistics.
They’re already grouped together in a list that you already linked in the original post
So what’s the problem with adding another group for duplicates?