This is provably wrong, and everyone can check it for themselves with a simple double slit experiment, or the triple polarizer experiment. Information does interact with matter. Furthermore, all points to “matter” just being a different form of information.
Skipping that, the rest is a nice manifesto for perceptual relativism… but I wouldn’t go as far as disregarding all objective reality, or defending a “magical” interpretation.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but…
This is provably wrong, and everyone can check it for themselves with a simple double slit experiment, or the triple polarizer experiment. Information does interact with matter. Furthermore, all points to “matter” just being a different form of information.
Skipping that, the rest is a nice manifesto for perceptual relativism… but I wouldn’t go as far as disregarding all objective reality, or defending a “magical” interpretation.