Your first comment was how logically this was an incorrect action that wouldn’t, in fact, land the employee a job. We all get that, that’s why it’s a joke
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
Suggesting examples are not the same as explaining and therefore the interviewee will not be hired and therefore it is not a deadlock
Deadlock resolved
Iamdevloper has been chosen as the deadlock victim by lowleveldata
But the interviewee didnt suggest an example, they merely attempted to create a deadlock.
However, in their attempt to do so they imply that they CAN explain a deadlock and therefore should get the job.
The interviewer doesnt ask for an explanation, only if the interviewee is able to provide one.
I have a feeling that you have to do better than “implying” you know something to land a job
I have a feeling this post is a joke
That’s not possible. Everything on the internet is super serious.
Just curious about what makes you think that I’m not taking it as a joke?
Your first comment was how logically this was an incorrect action that wouldn’t, in fact, land the employee a job. We all get that, that’s why it’s a joke
I was responding to the comment that says they should get the job tho