This basically the premise to Richard Pryor’s movie “Brewster’s Millions” except that one of the rules was that you cannot buy or own anything. At the end of the month you must have spent the money and have nothing to show for it.
The answer is politics. Spend it all on a political campaign.
The political campaign is actually the innovation of the film, which was an adaptation.
ending
And then he realized that winning would break the rules, as the salary makes the position considered an asset, so he campaigned for “none of the above”. At the end of the movie, that option wins.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
This basically the premise to Richard Pryor’s movie “Brewster’s Millions” except that one of the rules was that you cannot buy or own anything. At the end of the month you must have spent the money and have nothing to show for it.
The answer is politics. Spend it all on a political campaign.
I loved the bit where he spent a small pile of that money on an Inverted Jenny postage stamp then used it to send a postcard.
Lucky it was set in America.
That is inherently a gift then, donation? No different that giving it away and morally lesser to giving to the poor. Breaks one of the rules.
Oh no. The no gifting rule is also in effect. It was his own political campaign.
Unless it is a superpac.
The political campaign is actually the innovation of the film, which was an adaptation.
ending
And then he realized that winning would break the rules, as the salary makes the position considered an asset, so he campaigned for “none of the above”. At the end of the movie, that option wins.