A jury returned a verdict of not guilty late Friday for two men accused of conspiring to kill RCMP officers at the border blockade at Coutts, Alta.
But Anthony Olienick and Chris Carbert were both convicted on other charges of mischief and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose. Olienick was also convicted of possessing a pipe bomb.
The two were arrested after police found a cache of weapons, ammunition and body armour near the blockade at the Canada-U.S. border crossing in 2022. The blockade was one of several held across the country to protest COVID-19 rules and vaccine mandates.
There was a loud gasp in the packed courtroom in Lethbridge, Alta., as the jury announced the acquittal of the most serious charge: Conspiracy to commit murder. The men showed little emotion, and the case was put over to Aug. 12 to deal with the convictions on the lesser charges.
That jury needs to explain how two men, one of whom had a pipe bomb - and both associated with a cache of body armour, weapons and ammo - were found not guilty of conspiring to kill RCMP officers??? Like wtf people???
The jury has a better view of the evidence than we do. Lots of idiots do stupid things like LARPing militarized rebellion without actual plans to leave their basement.
The article describes one of the defendants as a blowhard who talks big. Given law enforcement’s penchant for convincing idiots to self-incriminate, it seems possible that the defendants said and did stupid things without having concrete plans for murder.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
That jury needs to explain how two men, one of whom had a pipe bomb - and both associated with a cache of body armour, weapons and ammo - were found not guilty of conspiring to kill RCMP officers??? Like wtf people???
The jury has a better view of the evidence than we do. Lots of idiots do stupid things like LARPing militarized rebellion without actual plans to leave their basement.
The article describes one of the defendants as a blowhard who talks big. Given law enforcement’s penchant for convincing idiots to self-incriminate, it seems possible that the defendants said and did stupid things without having concrete plans for murder.
Have a pipe bomb and a stash of ammo/guns would indicate some form of planning.