These small little handy-dandy devices seem to get more and more popular. Anyone here chipped in for a JetKVM yet? Looks and sounds pretty solid. Are there a lot of you that have aquired a nanoKVM?

@xia@lemmy.sdf.org
link
fedilink
English
7
edit-2
5d

We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would be quite small now?

@486@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
155d

Why? Even 1080p is more than what is usually needed for such a KVM solution. It is not like this is meant for doing remote work on a computer or anything like that.

@xia@lemmy.sdf.org
link
fedilink
English
35d

Because sometimes I would rather things be slow than blurry, and my workstation monitor is >1080p.

You aren’t supposed to do serious work over these things. They should be a last resort imo.

Create a post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

  • 1 user online
  • 169 users / day
  • 449 users / week
  • 1.17K users / month
  • 3.85K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.69K Posts
  • 74.3K Comments
  • Modlog