Self-Hosting Isn’t a Solution; It’s A Patch
fedilink
-29
Self-Hosting Isn’t a Solution; It’s A Patch
fedilink
Self-hosting is an acceptable temporary solution to a lack of privacy regulations but not a sustainable long-term one.
rhabarba
creator
link
fedilink
English
0•1M

Note that you don’t know what the hosters know, store and/or sell about you.

@cron@feddit.org
link
fedilink
English
2•1M

There is no way to be 100% sure, but:

  • bitwarden and ente have open source clients that ecrypt all data locally in a way that the provider can’t restore data
  • nextcloud isn’t optimal, while you can encypt data at rest, the provider might be able to spy on you
  • With mail providers it is difficult, but mailbox.org has my (personal) trust by building their business model on data protection and open source
Create a post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

  • 1 user online
  • 260 users / day
  • 494 users / week
  • 1.09K users / month
  • 3.79K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.91K Posts
  • 79.2K Comments
  • Modlog