85 percent of invalid papers continue to be shared after they’ve been retracted.
@ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
link
fedilink
English
2
edit-2
19d

Are there any public examples of that? The retraction process is so unbelievably convoluted and slow that I am surprised to hear it is used for censorship.

@RobotToaster@mander.xyz
link
fedilink
English
14
edit-2
19d

There’s a study on it here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10691350/

And here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266651822100022X

An article about a specific retraction of a study on mentorship: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/checkpoints/202101/the-bad-retraction

The lancet removed (although not formally retracted) an article on covid-19 in Gaza https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/02/political-censorship-in-academic-journals-sets-a-dangerous-new-precedent/

China has allegedly forced at least one person to retract a study about public opinion on it https://retractionwatch.com/2024/07/10/author-blames-retraction-on-chinese-censorship/

@ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
link
fedilink
English
119d

Thanks!

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

  • 1 user online
  • 282 users / day
  • 578 users / week
  • 1.06K users / month
  • 3.33K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.69K Posts
  • 87.2K Comments
  • Modlog