But the direction of causality is tricky. Do a democracy's flaws lead it to starve public media, or does starving public media lead to a democracy's flaws?
The fact that we’ve let the CPC continue to maliciously conflate “publically funded” with “state run and managed,” while diehard Conservatives nod along, heads firmly positioned beneath the heels of their media conglomerate ogliarchs, is such a gut-wrenching reality.
If they’re funded by the state, it would be very easy for corruption to sink in. Heck, I’d be more surprised if the government wasn’t influencing public media.
We already know that the US govt interferes with private media to some extent. Why not the guys who directly get paid?
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
The fact that we’ve let the CPC continue to maliciously conflate “publically funded” with “state run and managed,” while diehard Conservatives nod along, heads firmly positioned beneath the heels of their media conglomerate ogliarchs, is such a gut-wrenching reality.
If they’re funded by the state, it would be very easy for corruption to sink in. Heck, I’d be more surprised if the government wasn’t influencing public media.
We already know that the US govt interferes with private media to some extent. Why not the guys who directly get paid?
Pierre and the CPC are publically funded.
Therefore PP and the CPC are deep state agents of tyranny.