⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc7de/fc7decb1e83e2a7b3e9936f2b24f009071f758ed" alt=""
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
Torrenting:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
- 1 user online
- 119 users / day
- 526 users / week
- 1.17K users / month
- 3.39K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 3.8K Posts
- 89.5K Comments
- Modlog
It’s surprising it doesn’t happen more often.
They send out review copies to “journalists” months in advance, all it takes is one of them to have poor opsec.
I’m guessing the copies they send to “journalists” have some sort of individualized watermark. Of course that would only fight leakers, not the “journalists” getting hacked
There are two in the top corners at least
for this kind of release but bigger blockbuster I guess critics are invited to see it in private