Multiple reports are reinvestigating the neo-Nazi fighters and militias involved in the war both in Russia and Ukraine. “You have neo-Nazis on both sides of this conflict,” says Ukrainian American journalist Lev Golinkin, a longtime reporter on the far right in Ukraine and Russia who is critical of the Western media’s normalization of groups like the Azov Battalion. “We are sending a very dangerous message that if you’re the right type of neo-Nazis, we will not only work with you, we will celebrate you,” Golinkin notes.
We also speak with national security reporter Ben Makuch, whose investigations reveal the networks connecting Ukrainian and Russian militias and American neo-Nazis. An anti-Putin Russian militia that carried out attacks inside Russia in May was led by a neo-Nazi who has maintained links with American neo-Nazis. In a new piece, Makuch also shares the story of an American military veteran wanted for murder who is now fighting for ultranationalist groups in Ukraine. “We know there has been secretive pipelines and networks,” says Makuch. “That still exists.”
We end today’s show with the first — we are going to talk today about what’s happening in Ukraine. We’re joined right now by two people, by a journalist who’s written extensively in The Intercept, a reporter who’s looked at the role of neo-Nazis in the war. The Ukrainian-born journalist Lev Golinkin is also with us. He recently wrote a piece for The Nation headlined “The Western Media Is Whitewashing the Azov Battalion.” The piece looks at the neo-Nazi roots of one of Ukraine’s most heralded paramilitary forces. Earlier this month, Turkey released five former Azov commanders who were being held in Turkey. They flew back on a plane with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Meanwhile, The Intercept recently detailed how an anti-Putin Russian militia that carried out attacks inside Russia in May is led by a neo-Nazi who’s maintained links with American neo-Nazis. That piece was written by Ben Makuch, a national security reporter who used to work as a correspondent for Vice News Tonight. Ben has also just written a new piece for The Intercept about an American Army vet, wanted for murder in the United States, who escaped to Ukraine to fight with the Right Sector, an ultranationalist Ukrainian militia. We’re going to get to that in a moment.
You keep saying I don’t have military experience, but how is any of what I’ve said wrong? How do you propose to find and filter out neo-Nazis? Do you truly believe all (or even most) of them are wearing their affiliations literally on their sleeves? Even if they are, how do you then suggest removing them? How will those actions help Ukraine rather than hurt it?
If you truly want Ukraine to succeed in the long run, why not tackle this after the war is over? As I’ve said, if you truly believe this is a problem then it certainly isn’t going anywhere. And if Ukraine loses the problem is solved since the neo-Nazis will be dead regardless, having died in the fight against Putin’s army.
I said arrest or remove prominent neo-Nazis, not all of them. They need to send a message, not go on a crusade.
It really shouldn’t be hard to figure out who they are, militaries know a lot about their soldiers and they can get more information pretty easily.
And what do you mean how to remove them? By force if necessary, this is a military not a company.
The reason I think this is important is I fear is the Azov battalion being hailed as heroes - which can easily lead to a rise in far right sentiment in Ukraine after the war. Not to mention preventing any war crimes they might be committing (we won’t know how much of this is propaganda and how much is true until the war is over).
It really shouldn’t be hard to figure out who they are
This is the kind of magical thinking I called out earlier. What happens if a member of the military accuses someone else of being a neo-Nazi because they simply don’t like them? What recourse does that person have? Why wouldn’t Russian agents inside the Ukrainian military simply accuse high-ranking members of the military of being neo-Nazis? You asserting that it’s easy does not actually make this problem easy, and saying “just do it” ignores huge amounts of complications.
By force if necessary, this is a military not a company.
Okay, except they’re probably armed and well-trained. What happens if they resist, or, even worse, band together and resist?
The reason I think this is important is I fear is the Azov battalion being hailed as heroes
I just don’t understand how these problems can’t be tackled after the war. Again, the problem solves itself if Ukraine fails to win. If Ukraine does win, this can all be tackled then and it won’t impact Ukraine’s ability to resist Russia’s aggression.
I didn’t work in intelligence or for the military police during my service, so I don’t know their exact methods.
But I did have access to a lot of information about soldiers as part of my position, so I know the extent of what they know is huge. And it’s not like we were routinely questioned or something.
Not to mention, they might already know who many of those people are since they didn’t really hide it in the past.
I understand your point about a possible resistance - but I honestly think they only need to grab a few prominent members (catch them at an unsuspecting moment, that’s what they did during my service) just to send a message that neo-Nazis are not tolerated.
The main goal here IME should be to deter neo-Nazis from banding together in the first place, and display to the public that neo-Nazis aren’t accepted.
I honestly think the remaining neo-Nazis will see it in their best interest to just keep their heads down - they know they won’t win a war against the rest of the army.
I do agree that an actual “purge” should only come after the war.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
You keep saying I don’t have military experience, but how is any of what I’ve said wrong? How do you propose to find and filter out neo-Nazis? Do you truly believe all (or even most) of them are wearing their affiliations literally on their sleeves? Even if they are, how do you then suggest removing them? How will those actions help Ukraine rather than hurt it?
If you truly want Ukraine to succeed in the long run, why not tackle this after the war is over? As I’ve said, if you truly believe this is a problem then it certainly isn’t going anywhere. And if Ukraine loses the problem is solved since the neo-Nazis will be dead regardless, having died in the fight against Putin’s army.
I said arrest or remove prominent neo-Nazis, not all of them. They need to send a message, not go on a crusade.
It really shouldn’t be hard to figure out who they are, militaries know a lot about their soldiers and they can get more information pretty easily.
And what do you mean how to remove them? By force if necessary, this is a military not a company.
The reason I think this is important is I fear is the Azov battalion being hailed as heroes - which can easily lead to a rise in far right sentiment in Ukraine after the war. Not to mention preventing any war crimes they might be committing (we won’t know how much of this is propaganda and how much is true until the war is over).
This is the kind of magical thinking I called out earlier. What happens if a member of the military accuses someone else of being a neo-Nazi because they simply don’t like them? What recourse does that person have? Why wouldn’t Russian agents inside the Ukrainian military simply accuse high-ranking members of the military of being neo-Nazis? You asserting that it’s easy does not actually make this problem easy, and saying “just do it” ignores huge amounts of complications.
Okay, except they’re probably armed and well-trained. What happens if they resist, or, even worse, band together and resist?
I just don’t understand how these problems can’t be tackled after the war. Again, the problem solves itself if Ukraine fails to win. If Ukraine does win, this can all be tackled then and it won’t impact Ukraine’s ability to resist Russia’s aggression.
I didn’t work in intelligence or for the military police during my service, so I don’t know their exact methods.
But I did have access to a lot of information about soldiers as part of my position, so I know the extent of what they know is huge. And it’s not like we were routinely questioned or something.
Not to mention, they might already know who many of those people are since they didn’t really hide it in the past.
I understand your point about a possible resistance - but I honestly think they only need to grab a few prominent members (catch them at an unsuspecting moment, that’s what they did during my service) just to send a message that neo-Nazis are not tolerated.
The main goal here IME should be to deter neo-Nazis from banding together in the first place, and display to the public that neo-Nazis aren’t accepted.
I honestly think the remaining neo-Nazis will see it in their best interest to just keep their heads down - they know they won’t win a war against the rest of the army.
I do agree that an actual “purge” should only come after the war.