I legitimately thought it was a foodbank that required proof of poorness somehow and charged a little above cost(don’t worry I hear Loblaws is also the supplier so they’ll just inflate the cost).
My hopes are dashed upon the rocks such that seeing it was a Bearverton article sparked no joy in me.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
I’m glad I noticed this was The Beaverton before I went and burned down the local Superstore.
Could just ignore that it’s the Beaverton and do it anyways
Whats stopping you?
I legitimately thought it was a foodbank that required proof of poorness somehow and charged a little above cost(don’t worry I hear Loblaws is also the supplier so they’ll just inflate the cost).
My hopes are dashed upon the rocks such that seeing it was a Bearverton article sparked no joy in me.
@onTerryO I thought this is what their “No Frills” chain of stores was already :blobcheeky:
Lol
France was a place and late 1700s was a time when peasants found a solution to this issue.
Let them eat cake?
LET THEM EAT CAKE - Galen, probably.
Isn’t a for profit food bank just a grocery store?
Yes, but I’m sure there’s some tax benefit to calling it a food bank. #RecordProfits
I laughed way too hard at this. God damn the Beaverton is just on fire these days…
The pages of The Beaverton today, the Toronto Star tomorrow.
deleted by creator