The attacks against Hotez began after he criticized a podcast hosted by Joe Rogan and featuring Democratic presidential candidate and anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Being a guest on Rogan’s show and debating against an anti-vaxxer is a mistake. By doing so, one is accepting Rogan’s frame of the topic, the debate can be edited selectively on YouTube to favour the anti-vaxx narrative.
“Debating” an anti-vaxxer on Joe Rogan’s show would (as the old saying goes) be like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter now great you do, the pigeon will knock over the pieces, poop all over the board, and strut around as if it won.
I’m all for open debate when the other side is acting in good faith, but antivaxxers don’t act in good faith. At best, you’d refute every one of their claims , but even then they wouldn’t change their view. They’d just (as you said), release an edited video showing you either stumped by their anti-vaxxer genius or (worse) agreeing with them.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Being a guest on Rogan’s show and debating against an anti-vaxxer is a mistake. By doing so, one is accepting Rogan’s frame of the topic, the debate can be edited selectively on YouTube to favour the anti-vaxx narrative.
“Debating” an anti-vaxxer on Joe Rogan’s show would (as the old saying goes) be like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter now great you do, the pigeon will knock over the pieces, poop all over the board, and strut around as if it won.
I’m all for open debate when the other side is acting in good faith, but antivaxxers don’t act in good faith. At best, you’d refute every one of their claims , but even then they wouldn’t change their view. They’d just (as you said), release an edited video showing you either stumped by their anti-vaxxer genius or (worse) agreeing with them.