I use Google chromecast for this.

There soundbars with chromecast support.

It is not 1000 it 10000.

You can try with setting g+w on pve.

I can’t say I share that experience. By biggest problem with player is lake of chromecast on IOS and half balled chromecast on Android (lake of volume level, default 10% volum, doesn’t see my speaker pair, doesn’t always discover chromecast devices).

I have not heard of Prologue and it support for Audiobookshelf (ABS).

Why would one choice Prologue over the ABS app?

Draw us a topology drawing. Please.

Agreed the PCI layout is bad. My problem is the x16 slot.

I would prefer 8 slots/onboard with PCIe5 x2 from CPU. From the chipset 2 slots of PCIe4 x2. This would probably adequate IO. Aiming for 2x25 Gbits performance.

Depending on the price I would like to use to replace my Synology, I will strip os and run standard Debian.

Sadly is very hard to repurpose an Synology.

Vaultwarden is a lightweight server of bitwarden.

Alternative implementation of the Bitwarden server API written in Rust and compatible with upstream Bitwarden clients*, perfect for self-hosted deployment where running the official resource-heavy service might not be ideal.

GitHub vaultwarden

Server side is more complex. So for serverside you will be hard to find non docker og non manual installasion.

Bitwarden have deb and rpm support.

BTRFS is currently not Journaling

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220513113826.GV18596@twin.jikos.cz/T/#m46f1e018485e6cb2ed42602defee5963ed8c2789

Qu Wenruo did a write up on some of the edge cases. Partial write being one of them.

I run BTRFS my self.

And I agree BTRFS , is superior.

Yes both BTRFS and Ext4 are vulnerable to unplanned powerloss when writes are in flight. Commonly knows as a write hole.

For BTRFS since it use of Copy of Write, it is more vulnerable. As metadata needs to be updated and more. Ext4 does not have CoW.

This will also happen to Ext4. You just wouldn’t know it.

I do it via dnsmasq, that Pi uses.

I have a ansible playbook, that i use to sync my Piholes.

Then i would go for Seagate Exos X20 https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/seagate-ironwolf-pro-20tb/2

If noise was a concern, they are noticeable quieter. WD Red Pro 22TB Hard Drive, NASCompares

I purchase some Seagate HDD, but was left with the feeling that I regretted buying them. as they are quite noisy.

I would go for WD red, when I get new HDD.

You arguments looks incorrect, -c:v h264_qsv and -c:v hevc_qsv .

I can be a driver issue, you can try with a Live disk to see if the issue persist.

Have you trid outside of Docker?

https://nelsonslog.wordpress.com/2022/08/22/ffmpeg-and-hevc_qsv-intel-quick-sync-settings/ https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Hardware/QuickSync

I understand the use case.

I stand by it is easy to get right, if optic is changing for the difference use cases.

QSPF is not build to be hotplug in that manner.

Correct, they are different physical connectors. But they are interoperable, if the switch support it.

There is QSPF breakout to 4x SFP. There is 40G QSFP+ to 10G SFP+ Adapter Converter Module

No the 10LR have a to wide of a bandwidth, so it will interference the other channels.

If the switch support QSPF breakout, a CWDM-10LR may work.

but it cheaper to by

• https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/72588.html
• 2x https://www.fs.com/de-en/products/72588.html

Then to by 1 CWDM 10G.

Use singlemode fiber G12 or G24.

I never experienced it been slow.

Normally the hard drives and network is slower the Borg.

Have you reported the use case to the Borg backup developer’s?

Borg backup, great software