• 2 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jul 22, 2023

help-circle
rss

I have thought about that, but Proxmox already has built-in a lot of things for virtualization and managing VMs and has less bloat because it has only one purpose.


If i mostly use CTs/LXCs the impact should be minimal (in theory), maybe even better if i dont have everything powerd up.


That’s interesting, haven’t considered that. Although I would want to run most things in CTs/LXCs and not full VMs for performance reasons. And Proxmox has more DIY feel which i kind of like. If I fail with Proxmox, might give QubesOS a try.


I would do everything in VMs, mostly Linux and probably one Windows. Proxmox would be only for managing VMs. I want everything in VMs because it’s more flexible for partitioning storage and i can have both Linux and Windows runing at the same time (which can’t be done with dualboot). I am student of computer science so i use it for programming, both for college and side projects. Sometimes there are a lot of programs i have so OS kind of gets bloated, not so much from performance standpoint but just mental overhead of having 10, 20, 30 programs and having to keep in mind what program needs what dependencies, env variables, etc… so i want to kind of group them to VMs and CTs.


Proxmox on Laptop, Network Setup
I am trying to install and setup proxmox on laptop and use it as daily driver. I want to make network setup that can use both ethernet and WiFi, whichever is available and i want VMs to be able to access LAN because some things dont work otherwise (like NDI). I have writen config file that makes 2 bridges and every VM would have 2 interfaces. I havent installed Proxmox yet because i dont want to mess things up (it wouldn't be first time :) ). My question is does this config look ok and are there some recomendations. /etc/network/interfaces ``` auto lo iface lo inet loopback # Ethernet interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual # WiFi interface auto wlan0 iface wlan0 inet manual # Ethernet bridge auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 # WiFi bridge auto vmbr1 iface vmbr1 inet dhcp bridge_ports wlan0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 ```
fedilink


This benchmark seems irrelevant
The benchmark with 1B rows in this blogpost seems irrelevant for comparing performance of different programming languages. It seems like the execution time of a program would be dominated by loading data from the file. And a lot of people posted solution with specs of cpu but not specs of disk (hdd, ssd, raid) although that seems more relevant. Why would they compare languages and solutions in this way?
fedilink