Agree that that is the only notable thing about it. But Corp legal departments will say anything to shift blame.
As to the whole story. “Legal product was advertised legally” could just have well have been the title.
No different than Ford paying a movie or game to include a Mustang
Also, Linus is technically wrong on several counts. GN said where it was sold (at an event auction).
also auction == sell: webster definition of Auction: “a sale of property to the highest bidder”
Even more ridiculous when LMG could monetize that 500$ of time spent into another video and make the money back.
Agree that that is the only notable thing about it. But Corp legal departments will say anything to shift blame.
As to the whole story. “Legal product was advertised legally” could just have well have been the title.
No different than Ford paying a movie or game to include a Mustang