• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jun 11, 2023

help-circle
rss

if we’ll have to retreat into a whitelist federation model with invite-only instances

That does not sound bad.


But to be fair, if you are an animator - you are really into pain.


Yet Disney found a pretty creative work around. But that might be a good idea that distribution and production should be separated entities - if well implemented well could solve the problem. Haven’t thought about it.




I like them both. But also non commercial piracy - or how we used to call it back in the days: sharing, should not be illegal in the first place.


and the 5 or so companies remaining would compete based on their own original content

I don’t see how this is any better, since if you want a specific show produced by a specific company you would still need to subscribe to their service, kind of the same problem we having right now.

Again, I’m not arguing for monopolies in general. But with media it’s what customers want - a single service they can access all the media they want, with reasonable prices or a subscription model.


Musik industry has an extra layer of rights management companies that deal with exactly that issue. So I agree, we could create a legal framework or even an industry self regulating system to work that problem out. But I kind of said that already:

We would need a global overhaul of copyright to work this one out.


Why are you that antagonizing?

A private monopoly isn’t a good thing.

Most times. But for media, people want to have all their media in one place for a cheap price - so far only monopolistic or oligopolistic services were able to provide that. It worked quite well for games and in some form for music (you will often have single right management companies in the music industry - like BMI in USA or GEMA in Germany). But in general, I would agree that monopolies (outside natural monopolies and those should be run by the state) are unfavorable for the customer.


Little unfair to say they “missed” anything when they can’t control what studios do with their licenses.

Little unfair of your to leave out:

due to the greed of Studios

Wich makes clear, I don’t blame netflix.


Good point, I think it might have to do with the way music is differently licensed. You will often have a “monopolistic” rights management organization like BMI in USA whereas rights for video and games the rights management lies more with the overarching productions companies.



Does not work for media, since media is a good that you need a specific version of. You don’t really care what potatoes you buy (simplification) but if you want to watch a specific show, movie or play a game -you can’t really subsidize it with another. So exclusivity does not work for potatoes but works for media. We would need a global overhaul of copyright to work this one out.


For a streaming platform to be actually useful it needs to be a almost monopoly like steam. Netflix had a chance but missed the spot, due to the greed of Studios. So it’s back to fractured marked until someone comes with a fresh idea of how to distribute video.


Also sometimes they will change your sex in the process.



If an AI has gained the power to overthrow governments

Facebooks algorithms are pretty close to this ability. But AI is not the problem - artificial consciousnesses would be, since it would gain own agency. And for all we know consciousnesses might be just a byproduct of a complex enough neuronal network with enough recursive loops and it already managed to appear more or less random at least once.



If someone deserves to be pirated into oblivion it’s Disney, for fucking up the copyright after making a fortune of public domain material.


The big MacBook Pro was shit. Almost switched to other brand after it.


Apple actually pioneered and pushed USB-C use with their Macbooks which had only USB-C ports. Pretty sure they kept lightning out of pure greed.



He is destroying his platform. While simultaneously helping competitors. While been forced to pay way to much and even pay for the layers his opponents hired. Genius moves all around.


Dude, he is a PR guy with Twitter being his main platform. There is no logic there.





But there are only so many Elon’s that would buy a sinking ship for a shit ton of money.


Nah, youtube content (for most part) is not worth the money or watching the ads for me.


Like I said, I would not have problem wit a mythical commercial reddit making money but respecting the user base. Even less with no profit reddit - making money to be able to function.


First I don’t see why reddit has to be a for profit organisation in the first place, since that’s kind of the rout of the problem. Users becoming a product that reddit is trying to sell to advertisers. At the same time if reddit would be respectful to users, creators and mods it would be a different story. But they are clearly not, they don’t respect the people who are making reddit work - but feel entitled to the fruits of their labor. That just irks me on a deeply personal level.

My main problem is not even with the API decision but with the way the CEO communicated with the community.


Why does reddit deserve to make profit from content made by others? They are service provider - they are not entitled to the work of people who used their service.


Everyone can do it for them-self, just don’t use a smartphone or a cell phone if you want to go more hardcore.


There are blacklisted email servers. And when email started you had loading circle for the whole internet.


Because the balance between capital gains and payed labor is way off.


Wait, this guy looked at twitter and thought to himself - this is the way?! Eat the rich, it’s the the only thing left at this point.