• 1 Post
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jul 05, 2023

help-circle
rss

Right, totally forgot about that step.


Haven’t used it myself, but similar to casa os there is also cosmos os, which looking here seems to offer some build in storage management options. Maybe this could be worth looking into?


openmediavault is ok for raid, but the containers aren’t one click wonder like in other NAS OSes

Since OMV also uses docker compose with a build in GUI to manage them, I don’t assume this would be what OP is looking for either? Unless trueNAS also comes with some repository of preconfigured compose files.


I am currently using Openmediavault for my NAS and can confirm that with an official plugin so far I havent had any issue with my ZFS pool (that I migrated from trueNAS scale since I didn’t like their kubernetes use and truecharts, but as someone mentions they seem to switch to docker).

Otherwise I am happy as well, but I am far from a poweruser.


Just to throw another option into the mix:

Maybe create a VPN connection with wireguard, then you can just transfer them however you’d do it in a local network? Tailscale would be an easy solution to achieve this.


Bloat and bad performance aside, you don’t see a benefit in having a all-in-one solution that in a way acts as a drop in replacement for people wanting to switch away from the likes of Google/Apple? I certainly do.

Yes, having a dedicated app selected for each use case will likely give better results. But it also means more management. And many users don’t actually need more than basic functionality.

But yes looking at the complaints, they should look at polishing existing features first.


Downside might be that this requires a good internet connection, which depending on where OP travels might not always be available.


This seems a bit impractical. 2 phones to keep charged and manage.

Depending in your use case can’t you just get some external USB storage?


I got a similar story:

I wanted to rewatch the first avatar before the second came out. At the time I had Disney plus, so no problem right? Turns out that here in Germany that only included the German dubbed version, not the ov.

Guess who doesn’t have a streaming subscription nowadays…


Tailscale might also decent be an option for remote access, right?


Somewhat late reply, since i didn’t have the time to start my conversion to OMV sooner. Definitely looks nice and installation was easy.


You are spot on that my first issue has partially to do with permissions. Following a guide at the time i structured my media library to some level with data sets in my zfs pool on truenas scale. But those apparently are more like filesystems rather than just directories. Which makes the whole giving permissions for my dockeruser a bit difficult (and also otherwise seems a bit less then ideal for OMV).

So since i wanted to structure it slightly different i made a new shared folder on my zfs pool and directories for my media in there and moved a few test files. Downside now is that this solution would mean that i have to move a ton of files, which would mean a ton of writes to my drives.


Apparently they changed that in one of the recent updates, but so far i really like the setup with docker compose. So much easier than the whole deal with applications in truenas scale. Copy+Paste stuff into a file, change some variables and a full stack of media applications is up and running so fast.


Currently doing some digging. Seems like there is a plugin (sharerootfs) that solves the problem that you’d waste so much space when installing ovm on a ssd.


If I remember correctly, OMV takes the whole drive for the OS as well.

I’ll take a look into that. I know that there are benefits to that approach, but i have a limited number of slots for drives and i’d rather not use a full SSD just for the OS. I’d ideally also run some applications on the same drive.

I love the ability to really experiment with pretty much anything without impacting the services already running

I’ll probably do my experimenting somewhere else and just keep the NAS as simple as possible


Thanks for such a fast and thoughtful reply.

I’ll go ahead then and try out OVM, it’s not like i’d be stuck with it forever anyways :)


Thinking about switching away from TrueNAS scale to OMV
As the title says i am currently considering switching away from TrueNAS Scale. My system has a Celeron N3160, 16gb ram, 2x18tb HDD as a zfs mirror and ssd storage for os My usecase is mostly just as a local storage and media server with *arr stack and jellyfin. ___________________________________________ Some of the reasons why i want to switch: * Truenas claims a full drive for the OS, no way to partition off something * no automatic updates (i get why it might make sense for stability, but as a basic user i probably value the convenience higher) * there've been issues with truecharts breaking the ability to update and the solution seemed to be to just reinstall the applications * applications sometimes don't show up on start and i have to restart _____________________________________ Overall i think TrueNAS Scale might be excellent for some, but i am just not quite the target audience. So i just want something simple that works. Now that Unraid supports ZFS that would be a consideration, but i don't really feel like paying (however i am not completely opposed, if its the best option). My first idea was Proxmox, but thinking about it a bit more i probably don't need the flexibility and it just adds more levers that need adjusting. So the current frontrunner would be OpenMediaVault for a simple NAS setup that doesn't need as much flexibility and is low maintainance. I assume the setup would be pretty straight forward and i can just import my truenas zfs pool and install whatever docker applications i want. _____________________ My questions would be: * Is OpenMediaVault a good choice for me? Or is there anything better? * Any up/downsides compared to e.g. something like a simple ubuntu server? * Is there anything major that i would miss out on by not going with proxmox?
fedilink

Concerning the first point there is also the case of content getting altered. For example TV shows that switch songs because of licensing.


That depends. I don’t think Intel actually wants to be in the market for whole (or barebones) systems. they probably would much rather just sell the processors and leave the rest to others. The NUCs were just a tool to kickstart the market, which seems to have worked quite nicely. The only issue being that now both AMD and Apple are strong competion.

So under that assumption this withdrawal makes a lot of sense, especially now that they need to focus all of their resources to catch up in their main business segment.


Didn’t Valve make similar comments for the steam deck? That they see it as a tool to create a new market and hope that others follow.

Even if someone else were to make a much better handheld. As long as it runs Proton/Steam Valve would still win.


I think you are right in theory, but it looks very different in practice. These automatic takedowns are done by the company hosting the files without any official legal regulator getting involved.

The rightsholder of such music licenses usually have vastly more resources and there are no negative consequences for false flags. This means it is better to overregulate which leads to a form of censorship.