Reminder that sites like israel.tv are still “illegal” to visit and all US ISPs are forced to block it, even though this directly contradicts Net Neutrality.

plot twist the poster is Empress

this is dangerous advice. courts can still subpoena the usenet provider for your information.

200-something

So just using your stovetop/oven exposes you to toxic gases? that doesn’t sound safe.

I guess that’s why some oven manufacturers tell you not to use it around birds.

yes

there are many solutions, but they should stay hard to find

imagine waiting for a torrent when usenet immediately saturates your link 24/7

depends on the voice language

I had no idea what to expect because I don’t use it, sorry.

Thanks

login-walled

I don’t think it’s a weird question at all. But also in some places it’s actually not legal to leave it attached when not towing. Then there’s the argument about it interfering with the way the vehicle is designed to crash safely.

the best version is always the default for me on yt-dlp, that and --embed-subs has always worked perfectly for me, weird you’ve had issues with it, this is the first I’ve heard of anyone having that problem.

You didn’t have cameras?

AWS literally advertises an isolated “GovCloud” service.

there’s absolutely no reason you can’t use git

I think for that to happen, it would have to be on a server hosted in the EU, owned by a corporation, with a user that just happened to report them for violations.

While I think federated services are a good idea in theory, the unfortunate reality is that they’re also privacy and GDPR minefields that nobody has figured out how to make legal yet.

Paradox of Tolerance

Yes that’s exactly what I was referring to.

They should be tolerant of people that don’t agree with them, and vice versa. But that shouldn’t IMO mean we have to like it or be banned from a discussion just because of a difference of opinion… but I have been seeing a hair trigger on anyone even remotely disagreeing on this.

That is why I qualified the statement with “if you’re not hurting anyone”… of course I am not blind to violence by others.

Genuine naive question, but why is it such an inherent problem being anti-trans if you’re not hurting anyone with that belief? Isn’t it even more “equal” to accept people’s right to have opinions you don’t like? I don’t think trans people shouldn’t exist, but that shouldn’t mean I have to like it.

Source:

they’re called crimeflare for a reason. besides being a government goldmine having access to everyone’s encrypted TLS traffic, they selectively enforce censorship in unethical ways.

why block kiwifarms when you still allow hosting monkey torture sites? or sites for sourcing bathtub HRT secretly sent to minors? they shouldn’t be policing the internet in the first place. this is dangerously close to invalidating Section 230 protections as well.

there’s so many more reasons it’s not even funny.

They are the world’s largest MITM as a service.

What have you tried searching the web for? I get many relevant results.

I use django for this exact thing, it’s my day job

can not know

Yes they can, the articles are named with the filename of the content that’s in it, and the data itself is unencrypted. But I wasn’t even talking about blocking uploads, just having content providers be able to take down existing content.

But get this, it’s even worse in Switzerland because the provider is also now forced to keep that same content from reappearing! This is called the “stay down” rule.

country where only uploading is forbidden

not exactly: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/sci-tech/downloading-and-uploading_what-the-new-swiss-copyright-law-means-for-consumers-of-pirated-online-content/45305402

downloading computer games and software remains a crime

In the US? Absolutely.

Downloading or uploading any copyrighted content without permission is not legal. It’s the same in most countries.

It could if that DMCA or some court order resulted in revealing your residential IP, and then your monopoly ISP terminates you. SSL/TLS would not save you there.

No but content owners could directly DMCA stuff that’s hosted on usenet, they just don’t.

yea that’s not true technically. the only reason usenet hasn’t been dismantled by infinite court cases is its obscurity.

then what’s the point of pirating if you want the company to fail?

yea that’s the majority reason why people do it /s

I think they were referring to the common trope of asking for more experience than is physically possible.

yea we need multithreaded json parsers

line 152 is the only thing past 3 levels and I’d say that one gets a pass.

Has any company ever sent a DMCA for content that wasn’t accessible via http(s) or torrent?

I understand, that’s why I suggested some non-easily-detectable solutions.

That’s not how VPNs work, you can’t just “block all of them”. I think OP just needs to use a pure-TLS VPN solution (like SoftEther) or an obfuscated one like shadowsocks/obfs from a not-super-well-known provider (or self-host it on a VPS/etc.) and they should be golden.

for real… the か character I would even go so far as to claim is often MORE prevalent without the question mark.

Why does that matter? The most popular Linux distros are run by for-profit companies.

I’m curious what real-world scenario you’re envisioning that is likely to happen soon.