It seems to me that if the point is to preserve the option in case of litigation: having the would-be electors meet, conduct a vote, fill out certificates, and hold them until possible certification by the governor might have been fine. This is basically what happened in Hawaii in 1960 – the Democratic slate was only sent to Washington once certified by the governor.
Going ahead and transmitting them and purporting them to be the actual certificates seems like a fraud.
The difference between this and Hawaii, 1960 is that back then they hit the deadline to submit the slate of electors and they legit did not know who won the election.
So the state legislature sent TWO official slates of electors with the caveat that the winner should be determined by the time they were to be counted and only the winning slate should be counted, which was Kennedy, and Nixon was the one who counted them.
In this case, there was no doubt who the winner was (Biden) and the false electors weren’t selected or submitted by the state, they self selected and self submitted. It was a complete and utter fraud.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
It seems to me that if the point is to preserve the option in case of litigation: having the would-be electors meet, conduct a vote, fill out certificates, and hold them until possible certification by the governor might have been fine. This is basically what happened in Hawaii in 1960 – the Democratic slate was only sent to Washington once certified by the governor.
Going ahead and transmitting them and purporting them to be the actual certificates seems like a fraud.
The difference between this and Hawaii, 1960 is that back then they hit the deadline to submit the slate of electors and they legit did not know who won the election.
So the state legislature sent TWO official slates of electors with the caveat that the winner should be determined by the time they were to be counted and only the winning slate should be counted, which was Kennedy, and Nixon was the one who counted them.
In this case, there was no doubt who the winner was (Biden) and the false electors weren’t selected or submitted by the state, they self selected and self submitted. It was a complete and utter fraud.
There really is no comparison.