The question was intended to be slightly humorous.
Someone got a stick up their ass about all the companion characters exposing their desire for the protagonist. Yeah, I saw it.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong the freedom of choice. Although I do agree the implementation of the romance options is a bit heavy handed.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
If you open the article and read it, it will answer your question!
The question was intended to be slightly humorous.
Someone got a stick up their ass about all the companion characters exposing their desire for the protagonist. Yeah, I saw it. I don’t think there’s anything wrong the freedom of choice. Although I do agree the implementation of the romance options is a bit heavy handed.