For starters, neither groups is representative of the homeless demographic.
And when you take a group of people who have the best chance of success through your selection and sample biases, you are engineering a positive result.
It’s showing a marginal positive result. It doesn’t need to target the entire homeless demographic if this income isn’t provided to the entire homeless demographic.
Social security comes with screening. That’s not new.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
Both groups were drawn from the same set. What bias are you talking about?
For starters, neither groups is representative of the homeless demographic.
And when you take a group of people who have the best chance of success through your selection and sample biases, you are engineering a positive result.
Well designed studies don’t work that way.
It’s showing a marginal positive result. It doesn’t need to target the entire homeless demographic if this income isn’t provided to the entire homeless demographic.
Social security comes with screening. That’s not new.