I know that there are use cases for [ ] over [[ ]]. There have to be. Why in god’s name would [ ] exist if there wasn’t a reason to use it over [[ ]]? I’m obviously the one in the wrong by only ever using [[ ]], because [ ] would definitely be better in some type of situations that I’m just not seeing clearly. Right???

I believe the reason is that bash is backwards compatible with sh and sh only has [ ], not [[ ]]

Solution: fuck backwards compatibility and use fish

Fish is starting to get more POSIX compliant as of late, the error redirect is no longer ^ /dev/null but 2>/dev/null

Fish might be good for interactivity, but in terms of scripting, just go straight to python. It’s not worth it.

[ is a binary (sometimes a symlink) in /usr/bin. It’s /usr/bin/[ 🤓

Affine Connection
link
fedilink
English
21Y

[[ is not a POSIX shell feature.

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 159 users / day
  • 317 users / week
  • 704 users / month
  • 2.84K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.57K Posts
  • 34.8K Comments
  • Modlog